data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10c28/10c28e9a472c3151d937fcb1e6930b3babe0bceb" alt=""
I keep thinking of it because that's what writers do: a) they obsess about stuff they've sent out, and b) they second-guess the quality of what they sent out.
That said, I re-read my piece this morning and, honestly, I highly, highly doubt that it sustains itself well enough to be considered a "Comedy."
I also doubt that my one-line synopsis does anything very tantalizing.
This is where I get philosophical, though:
*In order to figure out what works, you have to be willing to do some stuff that doesn't work.
And
*You have to be willing to see what you did get out of the work you completed (or drafted).
In my case, I now have a better sense of some elements of comedy: exaggeration, deception, misunderstanding, contrast... very few of which I successfully used.
I also wrote an entire story (which might belong in another genre!) that I can now revise, polish and possibly submit somewhere. At the rate I'm writing this summer, I wouldn't have had that at all otherwise.
Final lesson?
*Play and Learn.
1 comment:
Anjie,
What profound insights you just revealed in your self-evaluation of your writing. You've learned a lot already without the judges eval and opinions. That's the way to keep growing. Their input will be icing on the cake you've already created.
I'm proud of you!!!
Lovingly,
JJJ
Post a Comment